You define then as postmodern correctly and raise some really good points - but you have no explanation: this means this response doesn't answer the question - you must identify and explain which Modernist Forms this is challenging (or not). You have many oppotunities to do this here - the participatory/ironic/populaist audience, generic hybridity & Jameson, hyper-reality & representation, control over the narrative outcomes, ideology of taste/what is 'valued' or culturally good over style - all the opportunitie to discuss all these great points is here, but you do not present an explaination of how these challenge modernist ideas. Also why are these a 'problem'? You're so close Sophie but this is a fundamental requirement of the essay is the Explaination which you need here to improve.
You define then as postmodern correctly and raise some really good points - but you have no explanation: this means this response doesn't answer the question - you must identify and explain which Modernist Forms this is challenging (or not).
ReplyDeleteYou have many oppotunities to do this here - the participatory/ironic/populaist audience, generic hybridity & Jameson, hyper-reality & representation, control over the narrative outcomes, ideology of taste/what is 'valued' or culturally good over style - all the opportunitie to discuss all these great points is here, but you do not present an explaination of how these challenge modernist ideas. Also why are these a 'problem'? You're so close Sophie but this is a fundamental requirement of the essay is the Explaination which you need here to improve.
C